6/20/2023 0 Comments Diskmark x![]() ![]() Therefore, we obviously don’t have numbers for that. The MSI MEG X570 Unify does not support M.2 NVMe RAID. In any case, the results are excellent and there were no problems encountered during testing. The screenshots below show you the Crystal DiskMark benchmark for the. The read speeds are actually slower than some of the ones I’ve seen with PCIe 3.0 based Samsung drives like the 970 EVO NVMe. 2 pcie ssd + 1tb sata 7200 rpm hdd 32 GB, 2 x 16 GB, DDR4, 2933 MHz, dual channel. Still, the testing accomplishes the goal of ensuring that the motherboard works properly.Īs we can see, the PCIe gen 4.0 interface allows the test drive to achieve outstanding write speeds. Thanks to all of you, we are celebrating our 23rd anniversary I am developing CrystalDiskInfo 9 -Rugenia-. DiskMark - speed test for Mac OS X (macOS) Benchmark the performance of your flash (pen/usb), solid state, hard disk drives in just 60 seconds. Actual performance is determined almost entirely by the device itself. NVMe drive testing is a little bit different than other drive types as it has very little to do with the bus provided the proper amount of PCIe lanes are available. USB 2.0 and 3.x came in at 37MB/s and 89MB/s respectively. We see a result of 295MB/s in the RAID 0 test and 126MB/s in the standalone AHCI test. These are obviously not really tests designed to measure specific speeds on a given board, but rather to ensure that everything works as intended. Lastly, in the 100MB write test, we once again see typical results. USB 3.x and 2.0 achieved results of 303MB/s and 38MB/s. ![]() We saw a result of 581MB/s for the RAID 0 test and 125MB/s for the AHCI configuration. In the 100MB test set, we see results that are once again within expected ranges. USB 3.x and 2.0 results were 87MB/s and 38MB/s respectively. In this test, the RAID 0 configuration achieves better performance than the standalone AHCI configuration with 297MB/s compared to 121MB/s. ![]() All of the devices perform in their expected ranges with no abnormalities. Once again, we see typical results for this platform. USB 3.x achieved a result of 310MB/s while USB 2.0 came in at 38MB/s which as I said before was expected. Mac OS X 10.3.9 or higher Dimensions: 65mm (W) x 217mm (D) x 136mm (H). RAID 0 doesn’t really help here which is why it performs worse with this data set. Transfer rates with CrystalMark puts the two devices neck-to-neck although the. The AHCI configuration achieved a result of 609MB/s while in RAID mode, the same drives achieve a result of 444MB/s. Essentially we are trying to establish base line minimum performance requirements for a Virtual drive running virtual machines.The results here are typical of what we see for the devices in question as well as motherboards utilizing this type of CPU and PCH. OS: Windows Server 2019 Datacenter (Full installation) (圆4)Īlso, is there a specific recommended setup on CDM for testing drives that would be hosting virtual machines. Profile – Peak performance, Read & Write MixĬrystalDiskMark 8.0.2 圆4 (C) 2007-2021 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World: ( we found Tiering so much slower on CDM Tests ) Storage Space drive setup = 1 x NVME, 2 x 16GB Mechanical VD = Mirror – no tiering. ( I am aware this may be difficult to answer due to different types of VM’s and applications that run within them )ġ x Dell Samsung PM1725a PCI 1.6TB NVMe SSD Driveģ x ST16000NM001G Seagate Exos X16 3.5" 16000 GB Serial ATA III drives in NON-RAID Model I was hoping to get some advice on what the minimum performance metrics would to be on MS storage space drive for Hyper-V. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |